by Ruth Harris
Every writer has (at least) one—
- The trunk book
- The published bestseller to which the rights have reverted but which is showing its age
- The half-finished book, the abandoned book, the book—published or not—that fizzled
- The manuscript languishing on a hard drive or gathering dust under your bed
- The aargh draft aka the first draft from hell
- The outline/proposal no agent or editor on this planet or any other would take a chance on
They’re the orphans, the misfires, the unloved and the unappreciated—and they’re hopeless. But are they?
- You’re stuck on a plot point and don’t know how to get unstuck
- The characters bore you—and you created them
- The background or setting no longer seems relevant or even interesting
- You signed a contract for another book
- The concept—boy wizard—feels overdone
- The setting, the cold war, seems passé
- The PG version of 50 Shades you started with high hopes and a burst of energy, now has you wondering: what was I thinking?
The makeover, defined
Beloved by magazines and TV, a makeover usually means a “new look” or at least a bit of refreshing. It might entail a new shade of lipstick, a new hair style or a new gym routine. Applies to books, too.
Sometimes a few small changes—a new title, a zippy cover, a name change for the main character, some zany new incidents for a cozy—can add up to a big difference and a new life.
Rx for more serious problems: Rehab
Rehab is a bigger deal than the mere makeover. Rehab usually implies the major changes needed to make the trip back from a setback: booze, drugs, athletic injuries. We’re talking AA, drug counseling and Tommy John surgery to get the patient (or the book) back on the right track.
Ebooks have revolutionized book publishing in almost every area from editing, marketing, distribution, to pricing—and in one more but much less often discussed way. Unlike the hardcover or paperback of the TradPubbed past, today’s novel isn’t set in stone. In fact, the digital novel is almost infinitely malleable, the shape-shifter par excellence.
These days a lot of writers aren’t writing for an editor, a publisher, or to meet a deadline. We’re writing on our own schedules to reach thousands and maybe millions of readers—and we have more than one opportunity to reach them.
When I reread Decades, an international bestseller for me in hardcover (Simon & Schuster) and paperback (NAL), I still liked the structure and the story—a traditional marriage torn apart by an adulterous affair and the women who must confront the cultural convulsions of the mid-Twentieth Century. Told from the points of view of three women—wife, mistress, daughter—the story and theme seemed as relevant as ever but the book felt too long and the pace too slow.
To refresh Decades, I kept the bones of the story but cut over 20,000 words, deleted, tightened and/or combined scenes, and refocused the portrait of the daughter, a rebellious child of the ‘Sixties in conflict with her parents. I relaunched the refreshed edition and, with a boost from a BookBub promo, Decades went to #1 in the Kindle store and #1 in Women’s Fiction.
Three Authors Refresh their Books
As authors revert rights to previously published books, they are taking the opportunity to refresh them for digital editions. Self-publishing also allows for reviving manuscripts that didn’t fit the needs of traditional publishing. Anne R. Allen, Consuelo Saah Baehr and Harriet Smart share their experiences.
Anne R. Allen
“I had an ‘unpublishable’ literary novel that languished in my files for decades. It explored the myth of mid-century America as a ‘Golden Age’ through the story of a friendship of two Boomer women from wildly different backgrounds. The subject matter had been too big and difficult for my fledgling writing skills, so I’d shelved it.
“Two years ago, when I had several books on the bestseller lists, my publisher, Mark Williams, asked me if I had anything in the archives that might be quickly polished up and published while I worked on my next Camilla novel.
“I sent him one of the 20 or so versions of the ‘unpublishable’ novel. I was pleased he saw potential in it. He gave me some great suggestions:
- Shorten it. At 110K words, it was way too long for contemporary readers.
- Emphasize the humor and mystery aspects of the story, since my ‘brand’ is humorous mysteries.
- Think of a better title. “The Ashtrays of Avalon,” and “The Leaders of the 21st Century,” my working titles, did not fly.
- Beef up the opening scenes, which are set in the present and making the story more accessible to 21st century readers.
“After about three grueling months of editing, I sent him the 95K word version, newly titled The Lady of the Lakewood Diner which has been a steady seller for me, and has got some of my most enthusiastic reviews.”
Consuelo Saah Baehr
Here’s what Consuelo did when Amazon approached her about publishing her bestseller Daughters: “I had typed the book into my computer (yes all 700 pages) and had done some editing (always making scenes tighter) at the time.”
“Amazon did not ask me to change the storyline of Daughters although they didn’t restrict me. They wanted to edit for punctuation, formatting, grammar, typos, etc. At the beginning I asked them about changing aspects of the story that reviewers complained about and they said that reviewers always complained about the things I mentioned and I should leave the story as it was if I wanted to.
“I did some editing on my own but it was minimal. Toned down some scenes, streamlined others, etc. There was no difference in the way I saw the plot or characters. Here’s the thing, there is a segment of readers that object to any sexual content (no matter how tastefully done) and will one-star you and call the book trash.
“The Amazon publisher asked me to change the title because she felt the older title didn’t convey the breadth of the book. We went through several rounds and settled on Three Daughters and I went from a modest couple of hundred reviews to 750 in three and a half months.”
“Two of my other novels, Nothing to Lose and Best Friends, received new covers because I did not own the artwork to the original covers. Each book presented me with different issues and each required a different solution.
“Many reviewers of Best Friends complained about the ending and they were MAD. After about twenty complaints I changed the ending. One character who was hanging by a thread was allowed to live.
“Nothing to Lose had a lot of dated references since it was written pre-Internet. I updated some and just took out others that didn’t translate well.”
Harriet Smart
English mystery writer Harriet Smart took her TradPubbed books and approached the rehab this way:
“All in all. I have ‘rehabbed’ four out of my five traditionally published books now, and I have to admit I didn’t really do much in the way of textual tinkering, as I was quite satisfied with them as they were.
The most recent one, The Wild Garden, did give me some pause for thought, however, as it was a contemporary romance, written and set in 1996, and rereading it I was astonished at the character’s use of landline phones and handwritten letters. Email appeared but only in passing. I did wonder if I should update this, but the story would not have worked in the age of Google and Facebook (it is about old lover’s losing touch and then finding each other again by accident) so it remains a period piece—a conscious decision on my part.”My first novel, A Garland of Vows, all three hundred thousand words of it, is another matter. An unabashed romantic historical epic, parts of it now make me cringe with embarrassment. I was learning my craft on the job when I wrote it, and it shows.
“I would tackle such a story in a very different way now, I am sure. But then again there are parts of which I am proud, and I wonder if I shouldn’t scan it in, and try and re-form it into something that satisfies me artistically now. It would be a lot of work and I wonder if there would any real point to doing it. Would I just ruin it? A very difficult question and so it remains, untackled…”
Thanks to magic of digital publishing, no book need be left behind.Inspiration from pros like Anne, Consuelo and Harriet can be your best friend when faced with a book or manuscript in need of help. A makeover might do the job. Maybe a trip to rehab is required. Or even a week or two in intensive care. A sympathetic eye and some well-considered refreshing can come to your—and your book’s—rescue.
First things first: The Dirty Details of The Salvage Operation
The cover: One of the first changes to consider when you are contemplating a book makeover is a new cover. A new cover, like a new shade of lipstick, can make all the difference and help your book stand out in the correct category where it will draw the attention of readers you are looking for. If your book’s cover doesn’t quite convey the genre or tone, check the covers of the top selling books in your genre and see if a new cover could be the equivalent of a weekend at the spa.
Joanna Penn wrote a detailed post filled with excellent information about what was involved when she decided to change the covers—and titles—of her books in a successful rebranding effort.
The title: Perhaps your publisher stuck you with a title you never liked. (Trust me, it happens.) Or, perhaps, like Consuelo’s editor, you feel that your title, while OK, doesn’t quite adequately convey the tone or scope of your book. Now’s the perfect opportunity to spend time to come up with a title more fitting to the book.
Even though titles can’t be copyrighted, be sure to search your title in case it’s been overused. If so, think of a way to differentiate your title from the umpteen dozen already out there.
If you do change your title, be sure to add a note to the blurb indicating that the book was “originally published as [OLD BORING TITLE]” You do not want angry readers who already bought your book in its previous incarnation to feel cheated and bomb you with one-star reviews!
New author name: There is no reason not to use a pen name. Perhaps you want to start a new series or perhaps your book would sell better with an author name that fits well in your genre. Von Poopen Outhaus is not exactly the greatest author name for a romance even it is your real name!
New names for old characters: Don’t forget that in the original draft of Gone With The Wind, Scarlet O’Hara’s first name was Pansy. (!) Would Hannibal Lector be as scary if he were named Joe Smith? And what about that old perv Humbert Humbert? Choosing character names carefully will instantly help define that person. Name generators offer suggestions for almost any ethnicity/age/historical period you can imagine.
Strategic Revision
Once you’ve made the small makeover changes and you still want to address the larger problems in a ms., you need a diagnosis. Ask yourself why you’ve given up and try to ID the problem—plot holes, weak characters, slack pacing. The next step is to zero in and figure out how much and what kind of makeover is required to take your book out from under the bed and into the light of day.
Solve background/setting issues with research. Travel blogs and Goggle offer all sorts of foreign setting ideas. Get details on Southeast Asia at Nomadic Matt’s, the latest on South America and what’s offbeat, interesting and new in New Zealand.
- An unfocused, go-nowhere scene or story arc? Don’t forget the power of the delete button. Here’s a superb example from TV writer, Ken Levine.
- Need medical facts from allergies to appendicitis (or is it constipation?) Here’s a guide for fiction writers written by Jordy N. Redwood, an ER nurse,
- Too much tell, not enough show? What’s the difference and how to fix it with examples.
- Characterization issues: Good guy/gal or bad guy/gal, the super spy, the nutcase, the grunt who saves his battalion, the alcoholic teacher who can’t save herself but rescues her class, the jihadist with a heart of gold, the whore with a heart of coal, the psychotic, psychopathic, and just plain psychic are the writer’s best friend. How to write characters readers remember.
- First line blahs: A killer first line in every chapter can go a long way to rehab a plain vanilla draft, hook your reader and keep the pages turning.
- Endings that keep readers hanging on: The art and craft of the cliffhanger.
- How to write sympathetic characters readers will identify with and want to know more about.
- Need a bad guy or gal? Want someone despicable yet charming? Sexy but dangerous? How to write a villain.
- Here’s advice on how to fix your plot from Janice Hardy plus extra help from the story grid and Writer Unboxed .
- Bring in the rescue crew, aka the editor or the book doctor. Sometimes you need help from a pro. What an editor can—and cannot—do–advice from The Kill Zone.
USUALLY NOT WORTH THE EFFORT
- Changing a time period—sci-fi retrofitted to Regency—is most likely just too big a jump.
- Changing a historical from Edwardian to World War II will require massive research plus deep-dish psychological makeovers of characters’ personalities and attitudes.
- Satire into tragedy probably not worth the amount of work involved as is dystopian survivalist to contemporary romance.
- Hard-edged big city noir to small-town cozy is another bridge too far.
GO FOR MAKEOVER MOJO AND WIN BIG
English politician and writer Lord Michael Dobbs did, and look what happened when he decided that “Location is irrelevant in political drama” and transferred the story in his novel and BAFTA-winning mini-series House of Cards from London to Washington.
by Ruth Harris (@RuthHarrisBooks) April 26, 2015
What about you, Scriveners? Have you got a book in the archives that needs a makeover? A trip to rehab? Were you as pleased as I was to read that reviewers always complain about certain things and Amazon editors think we should leave the story as it is if we want to? Have you tried some of these makeovers?…Anne
BOOK OF THE WEEK
Sci-fi retrofitted to Regency – that would be quite a change,
Interesting the things each author decided to change or not change. I'm sure those items are unique to every book. Although making sure a title is unique is a big plus for any book.
I don't have any published titles that need a makeover, but my first published book came from a complete reworking of an old manuscript. I changed everything but the two leads, the basics of one scene, and a generalization of the storyline.
Alex—You're proving the point! Rewording/rethinking/revising can make ALL the difference and turn a book from ho-hum into yum-yum. 🙂
Hi Ruth & Anne,
Superb suggestions. I have a couple manuscripts I should probably re-create, but I'm always so much more intrigued by whatever today's WIP is. I imagine I'd be FAR more interested if some editor was hounding me about submitting another story soon. Ha!
CS—How about they wave a check! THEN you'd get going. lol
I got a suggestion of another major rehab technique from my editor this week: change from 3rd to 1st person. He wants the whole book in 1st instead of 3rd.
At first I balked, but I did one chapter and read it to my critique group and they loved it. 1st person connects the reader to the character more intensely and seems to punch up the humor a lot.
But oh, my what a lot of work. Ack!
Anne—Nora Ephron used first-person to great effect in her humorous pieces. I usually write 3rd post but used 1st in THE CHANEL CAPER and it *does" punch up the humor.
You're absolutely right that this is *major* rehab. You have to be pretty experienced to try it because lots of nuance comes into play so there's tons of rewriting involved. Ditto going from 3rd to 1st. It's basically like writing a new book so people should be forewarned!
I did a minor (major?) rewrite of my novella by changing it to 1st from 3rd. I figured that since I was able to write a synopsis in 1st, I should be able to do the book in 1st.
Beyond that, I have a bunch of stories in my slushy pile of ignorance that I keep thinking about redoing, but a lot of them have the issue of being stuck at a particular point in the plot. I keep thinking about them, but all I do is think.
I do have one that I'm in the process of adding to, but because the one major drawback to it is the plot itself (not for the squeamish, so I won't publicly post what it is), I'm working on implementing the 60+ pages of editing notes for it (among other thing, making sure it's consistently in 1st), so by the time I get done, I'll have my spine back and my writing boots on.
G.B.—From 3rd to 1st definitely counts as major and 60 pages of editorial notes will give you a good start on your next rehab/makeover project! Good luck!
Hi Ruth, I can relate to your post. Perhaps, I should dig out a dusty manuscript.
And it was encouraging to read that a bad review won't make or break a book.
Tracy—Sounds like there might be some ms dusting off in your future. When you read it, you'll have a better idea of how much (or how little) rehabbing it needs! 🙂
I've been in rehab so many times it's scary. lol But it works. That's the great thing about the digital age. Right now, I'm going through my entire series to make sure the last book's storyline coincides with the first book's theme, which rides throughout the whole series. I think I might need new glasses by the time I'm finished, but it will be so worth it.
Re: for a tired manuscript, I tend to blow things up. Literally. I either start something on fire, or have a car crash. Makes the characters do things they wouldn't normally do. Voila, new story.
Thanks, Ruth. Great post.
Anne—Even if you'll need new glasses, you'll also have a new and much better series so thats a win-win. Love your Rx for a tired ms: fires and car crashes are all good! Maybe a drone strike or two might help?
Ruth, this is so helpful. Many previously published writers who have out-of-print books gathering dust, feel that e-publishing these good novels is beyond their ability. I thought that, too. After I was up and selling, I made it my business to persuade other writers to do as I had done. We all thought out-of-print was the end of the road and now we find it is the beginning of another road. Thanks for spreading the word.
Consuelo—Thanks for dropping by! I love the way you expressed this, pointing out that what looked like the end of the road has turned out to be the beginning of another road. Back in the day, those of us who were traditionally published had no alternatives … now our alternatives are limited only by our imaginations.
Ruth, first wanted to say I loved Decades and read it in a few sittings. Had me hooked from page one. What a terrific post. I've revamped several stories over the years for ebook pubbing. One, a WWII script, became the first novella in my Lovers and Liars series, Bomber's Moon. Another went from short story to script and then to e book novella. Along the way, I added/deleted characters, changed settings, added scenes, and in general made it work. There's so much here in this post that I'm going to refer to very soon as I just pulled a gay romantic comedy out of my Writing Box that's neither funny or romantic. Just gay. I've got my work cut out for me but with this post as a guide I have a feeling I can do it. Hugs and thanks so much for this post. Couldn't have come at a better time for me. Paul
Paul—Thank you for the flattering words! You're a glowing example of the possibilities opening to writers as you turned a ss to a script to an ebook novella. I love your point adding/deleting/changing to "make it work." Making it work is the writer's job, isn't it? And to get there from here we do what we gotta do. 😉
Thanks, Ruth, an absolutely wonderful post! My manuscript has been in a rehab for the last months and I'm pleased with the results. Actually, writing is like cooking insofar as you can always use the leftovers the day after – and even the worst dish tastes ok if you add enough cream…
Katarina—…and garlic. Plus a glass of wine never hurts. 😉
Hi. I sent a comment earlier today, but it doesn't appear. Please advise.
Barry–I'm sorry that Blogger ate your comment. There's nothing "awaiting moderation" so it must have dissolved. I never know why that happens. Blogger does it to me sometimes, even on my own blog. Something weird goes on behind the scenes, but they never tell us about it.
If you remember what you said and you want me to post it, I can do that. But it looks as if you're back in the Blogger elves' good graces now, since this comment came through.
Anne–
It was a work of pure, unalloyed genius, exploding from the imagination like a star going nova–but now lost forever! Sigh.
From the DECADES' brilliant author, some remarkable advice that nobody should ignore – or if you do, you ignore it at your peril! – and it comes just at the right time for me! I've always felt I had picked a ridiculous pen name (Claude Nougat) that gave one the idea that I wrote silly comedies, which isn't the case at all (at least I hope that my novels are neither silly nor comedies!) Many thanks Ruth, this is enormously helpful!
Claude—Thanks for the flattering words! There's no reason you can't (or shouldn't) change a pen name you think could be improved. Pen names enjoy a long and distinguished literary tradition. Why not take advantage of it?
Love the post! i am in the middle of having to change my book. It was never published but after I finished the very first draft I realized it was not about what I thought it was about. So the characters kept fighting me.
I actually had to do a slight genre change, before it was more fantasy and now it is more science fiction.
Jesse–Thank you for the kind words. A genre change is definitely part of rehab/makeover. Can make a huge difference in clarifying the focus and making the job easier. Good luck with your 2nd draft!
Thanks so much for this great post and all the helpful links. I especially loved the category names "Makeover" and "Rehab." I think my trunked novels should stay where they are (dead and in the trunk-coffin), but I'm making-over my short stories and self-pubbing them. Short is the new long. Great post!! Have a lovely weekend. 🙂
Lexa–You'll love tomorrow's post. 🙂
Lexa—thank you! Making over your ss & self-dubbing them is great. Good luck!
Plus you never know when an inhabitant of some coffin somewhere is going to stir to life. Gotta watch out for the sneaky undead! 😉